Writing reviews is hard. Writing good reviews is
harder. This class has been both a thrill and a challenge as I’ve learned how
to cover and effectively review a whole plethora of mediums. Out of all the
mediums we have covered, I felt most comfortable writing about theater and
movies. I have been deeply involved in
theater and musical theater from a very young age and have a solid background
in stage production. Because of my experiences and knowledge of this type of
performance art, I could write my reviews of shows like Les Miserables, The Complete Works of William Shakespeare (Abridged)
[Revised], and Sherlock Holmes: The
Final Adventure from a place of authority.
I knew what I was talking about and could present a legitimate critique
to my readers.
I felt similarly about
the movies I reviewed, Django Unchained and
The Queen of Versailles. Here at Kalamazoo College I have taken
several film and film theory courses that have prepared me to speak
intelligently about movies. I have also been exposed to movies my entire life
and have developed a pretty clear idea of what kinds of films I consider to be
“good” and why. It was incredibly
interesting for me to read the works of former New Yorker film critic, Pauline Kael and learn how she approached
film reviewing. I really appreciate that
she sought to talk about movies the way real movie watchers talk about them
upon leaving the theater. I think this kind of mentality can be helpful when
reviewing mediums across the board.
Book reviewing proved to
be a struggle for me. I had trouble
deciding what elements I should include in my reviews of Afterglow and The Submission and
what elements I should omit. Since both books we read had received substantial
acclaim, I also found myself being swayed by the opinions of The New York Times or The New Yorker before I’d even finished
reading the books. Interestingly enough, I didn’t have the same experience when
reviewing Django Unchained, which I
knew had been nominated for several Oscars before I viewed it. I think, in part, this was because I didn’t
feel as comfortable reviewing books as I did movies, so I relied more on other
people’s opinions. Aside from books, I also had trouble reviewing the Academy
Awards ceremony because, again, I wasn’t sure exactly what I should or could
focus on. Also, the fact that the Oscars
had a divided audience- both the physical in-house audience as well as the
television audience- also tripped me up. I wasn’t sure how to navigate this
division and wasn’t even entirely sure that the show did or could accommodate
both audiences.
In general, I think one
of the biggest challenges of this course and of writing reviews as a whole is
that I’m not always prepared or confident enough to make a bold stance and run
with it. I found this to be particularly true with my final assignment; my
critical essay on AMC’s Breaking Bad. I
seemed to have competing opinions within my own head and found so much evidence
to back up both arguments about the series, that I had trouble deciding what I
really believed and why. It’s also scary and unnerving to put myself out there
and make a statement, especially because Breaking
Bad is a television show that so many people feel passionately about and
also because my piece can be read by a larger audience than our (forgiving)
journalism class. As I move forward, I want to continue building my confidence as a writer and continue developing my voice. The exposure I received in Arts Journalism to so many different types of reviewing, however, has definitely helped to build that confidence and has helped me see that I can, in fact, maintain a position of authority about a large variety of subjects, even if I’m not necessarily an expert in every field I am reviewing. This class helped solidify my passion for this type of writing and I am looking forward to doing more of it in the future.